‘Mr. PM, your hand-wringing is a sign of impotence’

‘Mr. PM, your hand-wringing is a sign of impotence’


By Rajdeep Sardesai

Dear Dr. Singh,

Greetings! This is my second open letter to you this year.

The first was in May when I had raised the issue of political corruption. To quote from the May 28 letter: “There is little doubt sir of your personal integrity, but would you concede that it’s been difficult for you to check corruption amongst your Ministerial colleagues? As a supplementary may I ask that if the CBI had been investigating a Congress Minister and not an ally like A. Raja of the DMK, would you have shown the same leniency?”

Unfortunately, I did not receive a response to my query. Now, I know why. It has become increasingly apparent as the 2G scam unfolds that the DMK was a law unto itself in your government. While you did write to the then Telecom Minister in November 2007 voicing your concerns over spectrum pricing and asking him to ensure a fair and transparent auction, the fact is Raja ignored your missive. Yet, instead of dismissing him from the Union Cabinet for challenging Prime Ministerial authority, he was “rewarded” in May 2009 with the same portfolio, only because the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister threw a tantrum.

Had you acted against Raja three years ago, you might have been able to rise above the stench of corruption that now envelops your government. More importantly, it has perhaps for the first time in your long and distinguished career in public life stained the “Mr. Clean” image, which you have so assiduously maintained.

Dr. Singh, your life story has been an inspiration for millions of Indians. The story of the rise of a young boy from Gah village, walking miles to his school, studying  under the dim light of a kerosene lamp, working his way up through scholarship inspires hope in all our hearts. When you became Prime Minister, we rejoiced in the belief that at last we had found a leader we could identify with, someone who wasn’t a spoilt dynast, but a genuine representative of the great Indian middle class dream.

Critical to this identification process was the knowledge that this was a Prime Minister, who was personally incorruptible. It was a bit like being transported back to the 1970s Amol Palekar era of cinema, where the honest bank manager in a bush shirt touched a chord with audiences through old fashioned values of simplicity and decency.

A bank manager may well be  of “impeccable” personal integrity at home, but if he allows his clerks to loot the bank, then he clearly is failing in his primary responsibility at the workplace. Sadly, that’s exactly what seems to have happened in the UPA Cabinet, and your continual hand-wringing is now becoming a sign of impotence.


At one level, there is obvious empathy with the situation you find yourself in. A coalition government is by its very nature a political arrangement based on compromise. Part of  the compromise appears to be a readiness to allow every constituent to set its own rules of engagement, including when it comes to cornering the “ATM” cash-rich portfolios. The NDA which is planning a national campaign on corruption would be well-advised to examine its own track record in this regard.

Frankly though, one is weary of reducing corruption to a zero sum UPA versus NDA political battle. The average Indian citizen is not interested in knowing, who is more corrupt, the Congress-NCP government in Maharashtra or the BJP government in Karnataka. The left may have a better track record, but let’s not forget that their prime ally in Tamil Nadu is Jayalalithaa, who still faces serious corruption cases against her.

What the aam admi seeks is a readiness to act against the corrupt and make examples of  them. Your leader, Sonia Gandhi, claims to her parliamentary party that the Congress has “acted” against corruption. Can the notion of “action” be defined please? Forcing a Minister to resign is not action, prosecuting him would be. Handing over a case to the CBI is not action, ensuring that the investigation is taken to its logical conclusion would be.

The nation is not a set of  gullible MPs, who will be taken in by rhetorical flourishes. We don’t need to become a lynch mob, but the fact is an alert and enraged Indian citizenry will no longer settle for fine words alone.

Here’s a concrete suggestion: Why don’t you amend the Prevention of Corruption Act to ensure that all corruption cases involving public servants, be they officials or politicians, are put on fast track? If they are proved innocent, restore their dignity. If they are guilty, have them jailed and their properties confiscated. You may lack political support for your move, but trust me; an entire nation will cheer you on.

Post-script: May I also suggest a brief yearend family holiday to rejuvenate yourself in this make or break fight against corruption. The country needs a re-invented Manmohan Singh, who is willing to crack the whip  in 2011, not a passive observer of  the muck around him. Happy New Year!

Courtesy: Deccan Herald

About Us

The argument in favor of using filler text goes something like this: If you use arey real content in the Consulting Process anytime you reachtent.